References

Alai, M. (2017). Resisting the historical objections to realism: Is Doppelt’s a viable solution? Synthese, 194(9), 3267–3290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1087-z

 

Allen, C. (2017). On (not) defining cognition. Synthese, 194(11), 4233–4249.

 

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). Academic Press.

 

Baggs, E. (2015). A Radical Empiricist Theory of Speaking: Linguistic Meaning Without Conventions. Ecological Psychology, 27(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2015.1068655

 

Barnes, B., Bloor, D., & Henry, J. (1996). Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. University of Chicago Press.

 

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149

 

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639

 

Bechtel, W. (2009). Looking down, around, and up: Mechanistic explanation in psychology. Philosophical Psychology, 22(5), 543–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080903238948

 

Bechtel, W. (2011). Mechanism and biological explanation. Philosophy of Science, 78(4), 533–557. https://doi.org/10.1086/661513

 

Bechtel, W. (2022). Levels in biological organisms: Hierarchy of production mechanisms, heterarchy of control mechanisms. The Monist, 105(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onab029

 

Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. A. (2005). Explanation: A mechanist alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36(2), 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.03.010

 

Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2010). Dynamic mechanistic explanation: computational modeling of circadian rhythms as an exemplar for cognitive science. Studies in history and philosophy of science, 41(3), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.07.003

Bickhard, M. H., & Richie, D. M. (1983). On the nature of representation: A case study of James Gibson's theory of perception. Praeger.

 

Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

 

Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity (R. Nice, Ed. & Trans.). University of Chicago Press.

 

Boyd, R. (1973). Realism, underdetermination, and a causal theory of evidence. Noûs, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/2216179

 

Boyd, R. N. (1983). On the Current Status of the Issue of Scientific Realism. Erkenntnis (1975-), 19(1/3), 45–90. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20010835

 

Brentano, F. (1995). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. London: Routledge. (Original work published 1874). ISBN 0-415-10661-3.

 

Brette, R. (2018). Is coding a relevant metaphor for the brain? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, e215. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X19000049

 

Buzsáki, G. (2019). The brain from inside out. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190905385.001.0001

 

Carruthers, P. (2006). The case for massively modular models of mind. In R. Stainton (Ed.), Contemporary debates in cognitive science. Wiley-Blackwell.

 

Chakravartty, A. (2007). A metaphysics for scientific realism: Knowing the unobservable. Cambridge University Press.

 

Chakravartty, A. (2017). Scientific realism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2017 ed.). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/scientific-realism/

 

Chalmers, D. (2011). A computational foundation for the study of cognition. Journal of Cognitive Science, 12(4), 323–357.

 

Chang, H. (2003). Preservative realism and its discontents: Revisiting caloric. Philosophy of Science, 70(5), 902–912. https://doi.org/10.1086/377376

 

Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. MIT Press.

 

Chomsky, N. (1995). Language and nature. Mind, 104, 1–61.

 

Churchland, P. M. (1985). The ontological status of observables: In praise of the superempirical virtues. In P. M. Churchland & C. A. Hooker (Eds.), Images of science: Essays on realism and empiricism (pp. 35–47). University of Chicago Press.

 

Cleland, C., & Chyba, C. (2002). Defining “life”. Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere, 32(4), 387–393.

 

Cisek P. (2019). Resynthesizing behavior through phylogenetic refinement. Attention, perception & psychophysics, 81(7), 2265–2287. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01760-1

 

Collins, H. M. (Ed.). (1981). Knowledge and controversy. Social Studies of Science, 11(1).

 

Collins, H., & Pinch, T. (1993). The Golem: What everyone should know about science. Cambridge University Press.

 

Colombo, M., Hartmann, S., & van Iersel, R. (2015). Models, mechanisms, and coherence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66(1), 181–212.

 

Crane, T. (1998). Intentionality as the mark of the mental. In Intentionality. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis.

 

Craver, C. F. (2007). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299317.001.0001

 

Craver, C. F. (2013). Functions and mechanisms: A perspectivalist view. In P. Huneman (Ed.), Functions: Selection and mechanisms (pp. 133–158). Springer.

 

Craver, C. F., & Darden, L. (2013). In search of mechanisms: Discoveries across the life sciences. University of Chicago Press.

 

Craver, C. F., & Kaplan, D. M. (2020). Are more details better? On the norms of completeness for mechanistic explanations. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71(1), 287–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy015

 

Craver, C., & Tabery, J. (2023). Mechanisms in science. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2023 edition). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/science-mechanisms/

 

Darden, L. (2006). Reasoning in biological discoveries: Essays on mechanisms, interfield relations, and anomaly resolution (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498442

 

Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Penguin Books.

 

Devitt, M. (2007). Scientific realism. In F. Jackson & M. Smith (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contemporary philosophy. Oxford University Press.

 

Di Paolo, E. A., & Thompson, E. (2014). The enactive approach. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 68–78). Routledge.

 

Dretske, F. (1981). Knowledge and the flow of information. MIT Press.

 

Doppelt, G. (2007). Reconstructing scientific realism to rebut the pessimistic meta-induction. Philosophy of Science, 74(1), 96–118. https://doi.org/10.1086/520685

 

Duhem, P. (1991). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (P. P. Wiener, Trans.). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1906)

 

Dupré, J. (1993). The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Harvard University Press.

 

Egan, F. (2014). How to think about mental content. Philosophical Studies, 170(1), 115–135.

 

Erdin, H. O. (2020). Appraisal of certain methodologies in cognitive science based on Lakatos’s methodology of scientific research programmes. Synthese, 199(Suppl 1), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02654-3

 

Fahrbach, L. (2011). How the growth of science ends theory change. Synthese, 180(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9602-0

 

Feest, U. (2010). Concepts as tools in the experimental generation of knowledge in cognitive neuropsychology. Spontaneous Generations, 4, 173–190.

 

Feigl, H. (1958). The ‘mental’ and the ‘physical’. In H. Feigl, M. Scriven, & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Concepts, theories and the mind-body problem (Vol. 2). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. University of Minnesota Press. (Reprinted with a postscript in Feigl, 1967)

 

Feyerabend, P. K. (1963). Comment: Mental events and the brain. Journal of Philosophy, 60(11), 295–296.

 

Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against Method. New Left Books.

Fodor, J. (1974). Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese, 28(2), 97–115. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20114958

 

Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. Thomas Y. Crowell.

 

Fodor, J. (1981). Representations. MIT Press.

 

Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. MIT Press.

 

Fodor, J. A. (1987). Psychosemantics: The problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind. MIT Press. (Edited by M. A. Boden)

 

Fodor, J. (1997). Special sciences: Still autonomous after all these years. Philosophical Perspectives, 11, 149–163. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2216128

 

Fodor, J. (2008). LOT2: The language of thought revisited. Clarendon Press.

 

Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). How direct is visual perception? Some reflections on Gibson's "ecological approach." Cognition, 9(2), 139–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(81)90009-3

 

Frankish, K. (2016). Illusionism as a theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23(11–12), 11–39.

 

Frigg, R., & Votsis, I. (2011). Everything you always wanted to know about structural realism but were afraid to ask. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 227–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-011-0025-7

 

Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787

 

Friston, K. J., Fortier, M., & Friedman, D. A. (2018). Of woodlice and men: A Bayesian account of cognition, life and consciousness.

 

Froese, T., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2011). The enactive approach: Theoretical sketches from cell to society. Pragmatics and Cognition, 19(1), 1–36.

 

Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions: Rethinking the mind. Oxford University Press.

 

Garson, J. (2013). The functional sense of mechanism. Philosophy of Science, 80(3), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1086/671173

 

Gauker, C. (1994). Thinking out loud. Princeton University Press.​

 

Gendler, T., & Hawthorne, J. (Eds.). (2002). Conceivability and possibility. Oxford University Press.

 

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.

 

Giere, R. N. (2004). How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 742–752.

 

Giere, R. N. (2006). Scientific perspectivism. University of Chicago Press.

 

Gigerenzer, G. (2010). Personal reflections on theory and psychology. Theory & Psychology, 20(6), 733–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310378184

 

Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X97000010

 

Glenberg, A. M., & Swanson, N. G. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.12.1.3

 

Glennan, S. (2005). Modeling mechanisms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36(2), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.03.011

 

Glennan, S. (2009). Productivity, relevance and natural selection. Biology & Philosophy, 24(3), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-008-9137-7

 

Glennan, S. (2017). The new mechanical philosophy. Oxford University Press.

 

Goldman, A. I. (2013). The bodily formats approach to embodied cognition. In U. Kriegel (Ed.), Current controversies in philosophy of mind (pp. 91–108). Routledge.

 

Gomez-Marin, A. (2021). If the brain is the answer, what was the question? Current Biology, 31(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.101

 

Gomila, A. (2011). The language of thought: Still a game in town? [Review of LOT2. The language of thought revisited, by J. Fodor]. Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 30(1), 145–155. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43047509

 

Hacking, I. (1982). Experimentation and scientific realism. Philosophical Topics, 13(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics19821314

 

Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening. Cambridge University Press.

​

Hacking, I. (1985). Do we see through a microscope? In P. M. Churchland & C. A. Hooker (Eds.), Images of science: Essays on realism and empiricism (pp. 132–152). University of Chicago Press.

 

Haefner, R. M., Beck, J., Savin, C., Salmasi, M., & Pitkow, X. (2024). How does the brain compute with probabilities? arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02709. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.02709

 

Hallett, G. L. (1991). Essentialism: A Wittgensteinian critique. State University of New York Press.

 

Hanfling, O. (1984). Scientific realism and ordinary usage. Philosophical Investigations, 7(3), 187–205.

 

Hanfling, O. (2000). Philosophy and ordinary language. Routledge.

 

Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42, 335–346.

 

Hesse, M. B. (1976). Truth and growth of knowledge. In F. Suppe & P. D. Asquith (Eds.), PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (Vol. 2, pp. 261–280). Philosophy of Science Association. https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1976.2.192385

 

Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2015). Learning from history: The need for a synthetic approach to human cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1435. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01435

 

Howson, C. (2000). Hume’s Problem: Induction and the Justification of Belief, Oxford University Press, New York.

 

Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2012). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. MIT Press.

 

Huxley, J. S., & De Beer, G. R. (1934). The elements of experimental embryology. Cambridge University Press.

 

Kaplan, D. M., & Bechtel, W. (2011). Dynamical models: An alternative or complement to mechanistic explanations? Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 438–444.

 

Kim, J. (1989). The myth of nonreductive materialism. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 63(3), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/3130081

 

Kim, J. (1992). Multiple realization and the metaphysics of reduction. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 52(1), 1–26.

Kitcher, P. (1993). The advancement of science: Science without legend, objectivity without illusions. Oxford University Press.

 

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. Pergamon Press.

 

Krickel, B. (2014). The metaphysics of mechanism (Doctoral dissertation). Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

 

Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

 

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed., with postscript). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1962) 

 

Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems. University of California Press.

 

Laudan, L. (1981). A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of Science, 48(1), 19–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/288975

 

Laudan, L. (1984). Science and values: The aims of science and their role in scientific debate. University of California Press.

 

Latour, B. (1990). Postmodern? No, simply amodern! Steps towards an anthropology of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 21(1), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(90)90018-4

 

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Sage Publications.

 

Lee, J. (2023). Enactivism meets mechanism: Tensions & congruities in cognitive science. Minds and Machines, 33(1), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-022-09618-6

 

Levin, M. (2022). Technological approach to mind everywhere: An experimentally-grounded framework for understanding diverse bodies and minds. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 16, 768201. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2022.768201

 

Levy, A., & Bechtel, W. (2013). Abstraction and the organization of mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 80(2), 241–261.

 

Lewis, P. J. (2001). Why the pessimistic induction is a fallacy. Synthese, 129(3), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013139410613

 

Leuridan, B. (2010). Can mechanisms really replace laws of nature? Philosophy of Science, 77(3), 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1086/652959

Lobo, L., Heras-Escribano, M., & Travieso, D. (2018). The history and philosophy of ecological psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2228. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02228

 

Loomis, E. (2017). Necessity and apriority. In H.-J. Glock & J. Hyman (Eds.), A companion to Wittgenstein (pp. 346–358). John Wiley & Sons.

 

Lloyd, D. (1989). Simple minds. MIT Press.

 

Lupyan, G. (2023). Is language-of-thought the best game in the town we live? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23001814

 

Mach, E. (2013). The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Exposition of its Principles (T. J. McCormack, Trans.; 6th ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338401 

 

Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/392759

 

Machery, E. (2012). Why I stopped worrying about the definition of life… and why you should as well. Synthese, 185, 145–164.

 

Marblestone, A. H., Wayne, G., & Kording, K. P. (2016). Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 10, 94. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2016.00094

 

Mariscal, C. (2021). Life. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2021 edition). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/life/

 

Massimi, M. (2018). Four kinds of perspectival truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 96(2), 342–359.

 

Massimi, M. (2022). Perspectival realism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197555620.001.0001 (accessed April 2, 2025).

 

Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1973/1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Springer

 

Meijer, G. (2021). Neurons in the mouse brain correlate with cryptocurrency price: A cautionary tale. Peer Community Journal, 1, Article e29. https://doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.30

 

Miłkowski, M. (2011). Beyond formal structure: A mechanistic perspective on computation and implementation. Journal of Cognitive Science, 12(4), 359–379.

Miłkowski, M. (2016). A mechanistic account of computational explanation in cognitive science and computational neuroscience. In V. C. Müller (Ed.), Computing and philosophy (Synthese Library, Vol. 375). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23291-1_13

 

Miłkowski, M. (2018). From computer metaphor to computational modeling: The evolution of computationalism. Minds & Machines, 28(4), 515–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9468-3

 

Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9

 

Miller, B. (2016). What is Hacking’s argument for entity realism? Synthese, 193(3), 991–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0789-y

 

Millikan, R. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories. MIT Press.

 

Millikan, R. (2004). Varieties of meaning. MIT Press.

 

Millikan, R. (2017). Beyond concepts. Oxford University Press.

 

Mitchell, K. J. (2023). Free agents: How evolution gave us free will. Princeton University Press.

 

Mizrahi, M. (2013). The pessimistic induction: A bad argument gone too far. Synthese, 190(15), 3209–3226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0138-3

 

Mizrahi, M. (2016). The history of science as a graveyard of theories: A philosophers’ myth? International Studies in Philosophy of Science, 30(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2017.1316113

 

Monton, B., & van Fraassen, B. (2003). Constructive empiricism and modal nominalism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54, 405–422.

 

Moreno, A., & Etxeberria, A. (2005). Agency in natural and artificial systems. Artificial Life, 11, 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1162/1064546053278919

 

Nairne, J. S. (2006). Modeling distinctiveness: Implications for general memory theory. In Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 27–46). Oxford University Press.Machamer, P. (2004). Activities and causation: The metaphysics and epistemology of mechanisms. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 18(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590412331289242

 

Neander, K. (2013). Toward an informational teleosemantics. In D. Ryder, J. Kingsbury, & K. Williford (Eds.), Millikan and her critics (pp. 21–36). Wiley-Blackwell.

Neander, K. (2017). A mark of the mental. MIT Press.

 

Newell, A. (1980). Physical symbol systems. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 135–183.

 

Nicholson, D. J. (2018). Reconceptualizing the organism: From complex machine to flowing stream. In D. J. Nicholson & J. Dupré (Eds.), Everything flows: Towards a processual philosophy of biology (Chapter 7). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198779636.003.0007

 

Noë, A. (2021). The enactive approach: A briefer statement, with some remarks on ‘radical enactivism’. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20, 957–970.

 

Olsson, E. J. (2022). Coherentism. Cambridge University Press. ‌

 

Parr, T., Pezzulo, G., & Friston, K. J. (2022). Active inference: The free energy principle in mind, brain, and behavior. MIT Press.

 

Pickering, A. (1984). Constructing quarks: A sociological history of particle physics. University of Chicago Press.

 

Place, U. T. (1954). The concept of heed. British Journal of Psychology, 45, 243–255.

 

Place, U. T. (1956). Is consciousness a brain process? British Journal of Psychology, 47, 44–50.

 

Poeppel, D., & Adolfi, F. (2020). Against the epistemological primacy of the hardware: The brain from inside out, turned upside down. eNeuro, 7(4), ENEURO.0215-20.2020. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0215-20.2020

 

Poincaré, H. (2014). The Foundations of Science: Science and Hypothesis, The Value of Science, Science and Method (G. B. Halsted, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.

 

Putnam, H. (1960). Minds and machines. Reprinted in H. Putnam (1975), Mind, language and reality: Philosophical papers, Volume 2 (pp. 362–385). Cambridge University Press.

 

Putnam, H. (1962). What theories are not. In E. Nagel, P. Suppes, & A. Tarski (Eds.), Logic, methodology and philosophy of science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress (pp. 240–251). Stanford University Press.

 

Putnam, H. (1963). Brains and behavior. Reprinted in H. Putnam (1975), Mind, language and reality: Philosophical papers, Volume 2 (pp. 325–341). Cambridge University Press.

Putnam, H. (1967). The nature of mental states. Reprinted in H. Putnam (1975b), Mind, language and reality: Philosophical papers, Volume 2 (pp. 429–440). Cambridge University Press.

 

Putnam, H. (1973). Meaning and Reference. The Journal of Philosophy, 70(19), 699–711. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025079

 

Putnam, H. (Ed.). (1975a). Explanation and reference. In Philosophical Papers (pp. 196–214). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Putnam, H. (Ed.). (1975b). The meaning of ‘meaning.’ In Philosophical Papers (pp. 215–271). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Psillos, S. (2006). The, structure, the whole, structure and nothing but, the structure? Philosophy of Science, 73(5), 560–570. https://doi.org/10.1086/518326

 

Psillos, S. (2009). Knowing the structure of nature: Essays on realism and explanation. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234666

 

Psillos, S. (2022). Realism and theory change in science. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2022 edition). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/realism-theory-change/

 

Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1980). Computation and cognition: Issues in the foundations of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00002053

 

Pylyshyn, Z. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. The MIT Press.

 

Quilty-Dunn, J., Porot, N., & Mandelbaum, E. (2023). The best game in town: The reemergence of the language-of-thought hypothesis across the cognitive sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X22002849

 

Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. Philosophical Review, 60(1), 20–43.

 

Quine, W. V. O. (1975a). Empirically equivalent systems of the world. Erkenntnis, 9, 313–328.

 

Quine, W. V. O. (1975b). The nature of natural knowledge. In S. Guttenplan (Ed.), Mind and language (pp. 67–81). Oxford University Press.

 

Ramsey, W. M. (2007). Representation reconsidered. Cambridge University Press.

Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction. University of Chicago Press.

 

Rescorla, M. (2024). The language of thought hypothesis. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2024 edition). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/language-thought/

 

Richards, B. A., Lillicrap, T. P., Beaudoin, P., Bengio, Y., Bogacz, R., Christensen, A., ... & Kording, K. P. (2019). A deep learning framework for neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 22(11), 1761–1770. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0520-2

 

Richardson, A., & Uebel, T. (Eds.). (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism. Cambridge University Press.

 

Rorty, R. (1998). Charles Taylor on truth. In Truth and progress: Philosophical papers (pp. 84–97). Cambridge University Press.

 

Rupert, R. (1999). The best test theory of extension: First principle(s). Mind and Language, 14(3), 321–355.

 

Rupert, R. (2008). Causal theories of mental content. Philosophy Compass, 3(2), 353–380.

 

Rupert, R. (2013). Memory, natural kinds, and cognitive extension; or, martians don’t remember, and cognitive science is not about cognition. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(1), 25–47.

 

Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. University of Chicago Press.

 

Sanches de Oliveira, G., & Baggs, E. (2023). Psychology’s WEIRD problems. Cambridge University Press.

 

Sapolsky, R. (2023). Determined: A science of life without free will. Penguin Press.

 

Schmidt, S. R. (1991). Can we have a distinctive theory of memory? Memory & Cognition, 19(6), 523–542. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197149

 

Schulte, P. (2023). Mental content. Cambridge University Press.

 

Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756

 

Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge University Press.

 

Searle, J. R. (1990). Cognitive science and the computer metaphor. In B. Göranzon & M. Florin (Eds.), Artificial intelligence, culture and language: On education and work. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1729-2_4

 

Segundo-Ortin, M., & Raja, V. (2024). Ecological psychology. Cambridge University Press.

 

Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1, 253–329.

 

Seth, A. (2021). Being you: A new science of consciousness. Faber & Faber.

 

Shagrir, O. (2006). Why we view the brain as a computer. Synthese, 153, 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9099-8

 

Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (2017). Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life.

 

Shea, N. (2018). Representation in cognitive science. Oxford University Press.

 

Sider, T. (2011). Writing the book of the world. Oxford University Press.

 

Smart, J. J. C. (1959). Sensations and brain processes. Philosophical Review, 68, 141–156.

 

Song, Y., Lukasiewicz, T., Xu, Z., & Bogacz, R. (2020). Can the brain do backpropagation? Exact implementation of backpropagation in predictive coding networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 22566–22579.

 

Stampe, D. (1977). Toward a causal theory of linguistic representation. In P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, & H. K. Wettstein (Eds.), Studies in the philosophy of language. Midwest Studies in Philosophy: Vol. 2 (pp. 81–102). University of Minnesota Press.

 

Stanford, P. K. (2006). Exceeding our grasp: Science, history, and the problem of unconceived alternatives. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195174089.001.0001

 

Stanford, K. (2023). Underdetermination of scientific theory. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2023 edition). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/scientific-underdetermination/

 

Stengers, I. (2023). Virgin Mary and the Neutrino: Reality in Trouble. Experimental Futures.

 

Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. A. (Eds.). (2010). Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. MIT Press.

 

Şahin, Y., & Deveci, I. E. (2023, May 7). Against representations that do not represent: Reply to Thomson and Piccinini [Poster presentation]. 9th International Symposium on Brain and Cognitive Science, Özyeğin University, Istanbul, Turkey.

 

Tabery, J. (2014). Beyond versus: The struggle to understand the interaction of nature and nurture. The MIT Press.

 

Teller, P. (2001). Whither constructive empiricism? Philosophical Studies, 106(1–2), 123–150. 10.1023/a:1013170506726

 

Tirard, S., Morange, M., & Lazcano, A. (2010). The definition of life: A history of an elusive scientific endeavor. Astrobiology, 10(10), 1003–1009.

 

Usher, M. (2001). A statistical referential theory of content: Using information theory to account for misrepresentation. Mind and Language, 16(3), 311–334.

 

van den Herik, J. C. (2014, July 8). Why radical enactivism is not radical enough. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2105/16132

 

VandeWall, H. (2007). Why Water Is Not H2O, and Other Critiques of Essentialist Ontology from the Philosophy of Chemistry. Philosophy of Science, 74(5), 906–919. https://doi.org/10.1086/525632

 

Van Fraassen, B. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford University Press.

 

Van Fraassen, B. (1985). Empiricism in the philosophy of science. In P. M. Churchland & C. A. Hooker (Eds.), Images of science: Essays on realism and empiricism (pp. 245–308). University of Chicago Press.

 

Van Fraassen, B. C. (1989). Laws and symmetry. Clarendon Press.

 

A. Hooker (Eds.), Images of science: Essays on realism and empiricism (pp. 245–308). University of Chicago Press.

 

Van Fraassen, B. C. (2001). Constructive empiricism now. Philosophical Studies, 106(1–2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013126824473

 

Van Fraassen, B. (2002). The empirical stance. Yale University Press.

Van Gelder, T. (1995). What might cognition be, if not computation? Journal of Philosophy, 92(7), 345–381.

 

Varela, F. J. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. North-Holland.

 

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. The MIT Press.

 

Villalobos, M. (2015). The biological roots of cognition and the social origins of mind (Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh).

 

Villalobos, M. (2022). The concepts of mind and cognition in the autopoietic theory. Constructivist Foundations, 18(1), 26–27. https://constructivist.info/18/1/026

 

Villalobos, M., & Palacios, S. (2021). Autopoietic theory, enactivism, and their incommensurable marks of the cognitive. Synthese, 198(Suppl 1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02376-6

 

Villalobos, M., & Silverman, D. (2018). Extended functionalism, radical enactivism, and the autopoietic theory of cognition: Prospects for a full revolution in cognitive science. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17(4), 719–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-017-9542-y

 

Villalobos, M., & Ward, D. (2015). Living systems: Autonomy, autopoiesis and enaction. Philosophy & Technology, 28, 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-014-0154-y

 

Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Ed.; revised and expanded ed.). MIT Press

 

Walsh, D. (2015). Organisms, agency, and evolution. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316402719

 

Ward, D., Silverman, D., & Villalobos, M. (2017). Introduction: The varieties of enactivism. Topoi, 36, 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9484-6

 

Weber, M. (2022). Philosophy of developmental biology. Cambridge University Press.

 

Wheeler, M. (2017). The revolution will not be optimised: Radical enactivism, extended functionalism and the extensive mind. Topoi, 36(3), 457–472.

 

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Blackwell Publishing.​

 

Wray, K. B. (2013). The pessimistic induction and the exponential growth of science reassessed. Synthese, 190(18), 4321–4330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0276-2

 

Wray, K. B. (2015). Pessimistic inductions: Four varieties. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 29(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2015.1071551